A great paper which clearly explains the geometry of both the classical and quantum tetrahedron. Its aim was to show that classical information that is retrieved from a quantum tetrahedron is intrinsically fuzzy – in fact for a single tetrahedron it was shown that the uncertainty in the dihedral angles is inversely proportional the surface area. The paper states that a quantum tetrahedron is a useful toy model to investigate the classical limit of LQG and in provides boundary states in studies of the graviton propagator.

**Review of classical and quantum tetrahedra**

Six numbers that determine the shape of a tetrahedron, for example, the six edges of a tetrahedron, or four facial areas and two independent dihedral angles between them. There are number of useful relations between areas, angles and volume in this paper.

If the outward normals to the faces are labelled as **J****i** , then lengths are twice the triangular areas,

**J****i ****= 2****A****i**

Because it is a closed surface a tetrahedron satisfies the closure condition

∑** J****i = 0**

Angles between the triangular faces – the inner dihedral angles are related to the outer dihedral angles θij by ,

**J****ij ****≡ ****J****i ****· ****J****j ****= ****J****i****J****j ****cos ****θ****ij **

The volume squared of the tetrahedron can be expressed in terms of the area vectors,

**V2**** ****= ****-(****1/36 ) ****J****1 ****· ****J****2 ****× ****J****3**

In the quantized problem the four normals J1, J2, J3, J4 are identified with the generators of SU(2). So that,

**J^2 ***|ji,mi> * ** = j(j+1) ***|ji,mi> ***and Jz ***|ji,mi> = mi|ji,mi>*

Asymptotically the Casimir Operator

J= sqrt[ J (J+1)] ~ J + 1/2

## One thought on “Quantum tetrahedron and its classical limit by Daniel R. Terno”